Convener: Kathryn Wellen - Wellen@KITLV.NL
South Sulawesi offers an unparalleled window on the development of complex societies in the Austronesian-speaking world. The province has a rich indigenous historiographical tradition that developed in the absence of significant Indic or Islamic influences. These written sources offer a unique perspective on the interpretation of South Sulawesi archaeological sites. This panel seeks to summarize, analyze and contextualize recent archaeological research on the development of complex societies, and attempt to link our present knowledge to the extant historiographic sources. Three papers present recent work in Mandar, the Cenrana Valley, and the Makasar-speaking areas to the south. Two more papers examine the development of complex societies within the theoretical frameworks of political anthropology and Southeast Asian archaeology.
Proposed by:
Sofwan Noerwidi, Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, France and Balai Arkeologi Yogyakarta, D.I. Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Anton Ferdianto, Balai Arkeologi Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
Vida Pervaya Rusiyanti Kusmartono, ANU, Canberra, Australia and Balai Arkeologi Banjarmasin, South Kalimantan, Indonesia
 
Session Abstract
Island of Southeast Asia lies on two shallow continental shelf named Sunda Land and Sahul Land, and restricted by a deep sea situation called Wallace zone. The Sunda land, started to rise roughly during the Late Pliocene and the Early Pleistocene. The dynamics of the land was effected by the decline of sea level in several glacial periods during the Pleistocene times, but Wallace zone was never connected Sunda Land and Sahul Land even in the maximum glacial period. In the early Pleistocene, Homo erectus started to reach Java which part of Sunda Land from the Asian continent, and this event has became as one of the oldest human occupation outside Africa.
Homo erectus was take a long span chronological occupation in this region, beginning from the ‘archaic’ Homo erectus after 1.8 Ma which brought Oldowan and Acheulean technology from Africa, to the extinct of progressive Homo erectus around 70-40 Ka. And after follow by the anatomical modern human which started to colonize this island presumed to be as early 125 Ka following a new faunal group from Asian Mainland in the early Late Pleistocene at maximum interglacial period, and through to Sahul Land around 60 Ka. Early anatomical modern human occupation in Island of Southeast Asia were reflected by Niah (45 Ka), Tabon (40 Ka) and Wajak (35 Ka) fossils. Another important late Pleistocene human fossil was discovered in 2003 in Liang Bua, Flores, located in Wallace zone which date back to 70 Ka and identified as a new human species caused by a complexity of endemism and isolation.
Along Pleistocene times, biogeography of this region was impacted by climatic and sea-level changes. Dispersals and endemism process was affected the faunal succession and human with their culture as adaptation reflex. This session invite papers to discussing human with their capability to adapt, also tools innovation which suite with environmental condition, and paleoenvironment context during the Pleistocene times in Island of Southeast Asia. Furthermore, also prospect of new sites discoveries and future research on Pleistocene Prehistory in Island of Southeast Asia.
Contact:
noerwidi@arkeologijawa.com
antonferdianto18@gmail.com
vida.kusmartono@gmail.com

 
Conveners: Bui Minh Tri and Do Truong Giang (giangiseas@gmail.com)
Institute of Imperial Citadel Studies (IICS) – Vietnam Academy of Social Sciences (VASS)
Abstract:
Institute of Imperial Citadel Studies (IICS) is a research Institute of Vietnam Academy of Social Sciences (VASS) specializes in studying Vietnam ancient citadels. For years, Archaeologists of Institute of Imperial Citadel Studies have carried out various archaeological excavations at kiln sites in north Vietnam including Chu Đậu, Ngói, Cậy (Hải Dương province), Đương Xá, Quả Cảm (Bắc Ninh province). These new findings contribute significantly to the understanding of historical development and socio-political aspects of Vietnamese ceramics.From those experiences, and from the reality of the research project at Thăng Long Imperial Citadel (Hà Nội), since 2011 up to now, huge efforts have been made to study Asian trading ceramics discovered at Thăng Long Imperial Citadel site.
In that context, Institute of Imperial Citadel Studies plans to organize a panel focusing on Vietnamese ceramics in the context of Asian Trading ceramics. This panel aims to bring together Vietnamese and international scholars specialized in Vietnamese and Asian trading ceramics with novel and multidisciplinary approaches to address the following issues: the chronology and characteristics of Vienamese ceramics; the technique and production of Vietnamese ceramics; the engagement of Vietnamese ceramics in the international ceramic markets in pre-modern period. Apart from Vietnamese ceramics, this panel also seeks the contributions from experts in the field of Asian trading ceramics to discuss about the influence, exchange and competition of various ceramic traditions in the region.
Noel Hidalgo Tan
SEAMEO SPAFA
noel@seameo-spafa.org
AdhiAgusOctaviana
The National Research Center of Archaeology (PuslitArkenas, Jakarta)
aaoktaviana@gmail.com
Victoria N. Scott
University College London
victoria_scott_uk@yahoo.co.uk
 
Research into the rock art of Southeast Asia has seen tremendous advances in the last decade, enjoying the benefits of new recording and image enhancement methodologies, discoveries of sites in previously unexplored areas, and new dates that suggest interesting theories about the migration and spread of people throughout the region. These findings contribute to a larger understanding of human behaviour before written records, and in some instances, during the historic period as well. In keeping with this momentum, we invite papers on the rock art of Southeast Asia, including but not limited to:
  • New discoveries of sites
  • Regional analyses and comparisons between sites
  • Rock art and its relations to prehistoric or historic archaeology
  • Commentaries of styles
  • New recording and analysing methodologies
  • Migration theories and rock art
  • Anthropological approaches to Rock Art?
Session Proposed by J. Eleazar R. Bersales, Ph.D., Head Curator, University of San Carlos Museum and Associate Professor, Department of Anthropology, Sociology and History, University of San Carlos, Cebu City
 
 
Abstract
 
This session invites museum curators, researchers and young scholars to present papers that reflect on how archaeologists present the past to the general public through museum exhibitions.
 
Archaeologists work with museums to eventually present the results of their work through the material remains recovered. This is intended to inform the public and fulfills the important criterion of public access to otherwise ‘specialist’ knowledge. How significant results are presented can often become venues of contentious debate and discourse among the public, however.
 
This session will look at the ways archaeologists work with curators or act as curators themselves as they present the past through different exhibition designs, pedagogical techniques, and collections management protocols, all of which shape the non-archaeologist’s perception of the past.

From J. Eleazar (Jobers) R. Bersales, Ph.D. (jerbersales@usc.edu.ph)
This panel explores the multitude of data emanating from current research at the Plain of Jars. Recent discoveries now place the Plain of Jars increasingly within Southeast Asia’s mainstream archaeology. Though some developments are relatively well documented, like the findings from a multi-year research project led by Lao and international researchers, some discoveries, particularly in iconography, remain undocumented. Participants in this panel will present their current and recent research in the archaeology and iconography of the Plain of Jars. We also invite papers on the recent World Heritage dossier for the Plain of Jars, submitted in the early part of 2018.
 
Emails to Panel Organiser: Dr. Lia Genovese, trinacria_1955@yahoo.co.uk
 
 
Lia Genovese, PhD
Tel: +66 (0)9 99 25 42 34 (Mobile, Thailand)
LINE User ID: trinacria1955 (+66 (0)9 99 25 42 34)
WhatsApp: +66 (0)9 99 25 42 34
 
SESSION CHAIRS:
Dr Jennifer Rodrigues, Western Australian Museum (Jennifer.Rodrigues@museum.wa.gov.au)
Ms Abhirada Pook Komoot, University of Western Australia (abhirada.komoot@research.uwa.edu.au)
 
The interconnections of two major Oceans—the Indian and Pacific Oceans—have dominated Southeast Asian maritime heritage for thousands of years, enabling movement of, and interaction between, people, ideas and goods. Confirmation of the relationship between Southeast Asia with other regions is evidenced in the dispersal of Austronesian languages, spoken widely in Southeast Asia. Due to the sea providing travel routes to distant regions of the Pacific and Indian Oceans, the expansion of the languages suggests that people from Southeast Asia migrated to both sides—eastward to Oceania and Africa to the west. Furthermore, influences of maritime activities have spread beyond ports and maritime settlements. Research has revealed that mainland Southeast Asia including Myanmar, Thailand, Lao PDR, Cambodia and Vietnam also benefited from nautical skills through their complex riverine networks. Material traces from the hinterland and along coastal rims of both oceans, show that Southeast Asia has long been a dynamic region with an intense mix of cultures in its geographical crossroads. In ancient times, Southeast Asia was the only maritime gateway to China from the west. Research on maritime history in Southeast Asia, therefore, is crucial in defining the foundations of modern economic patterns.
 
This session welcomes researchers and young scholars from a wide range of fields and disciplines to share their work on Southeast Asia’s maritime past. It aims to gain, and discuss, new insight into the maritime history of the region’s connections with the wider world. Papers may include, but are not limited to, studies in material culture, traditional practices, and awareness-raising programs through preservation and interpretation of the archaeological resources. Raising public awareness of the importance and potential of our maritime heritage can enrich our understanding of the past, and help forge cooperation and common ground for preserving and appreciating our shared heritage.
Human remains are encountered in different archaeological contexts. The presence of these remains reveals multiple sets of data into the life ways, as well as death ways of people in the past. As people are not only bearers of cultural beliefs and practices but also representatives of a population’s diet, health and nutrition, their remains persist to be a vital subject for study in archaeology.
This session aims to discuss current bioarchaeological research in the Philippines by researchers from the Archaeology and Ethnology Divisions of the National Museum of the Philippines.  Papers in this session will tackle analyses of human remains in different settings, of different time periods, for different research objectives. In one of the highest peaks in the Cordilleras where mummification of the dead was practiced, tourism and a shift in cultural beliefs begs the question of community response and the value of conservation. In a Visayan island facing the Philippine Sea, the devastation of a supertyphoon led to the destruction and eventual restoration of a magnificent church where a sizeable number of human skeletal remains were retrieved in the process. A joint research on previously collected human remains that are kept at the National Museum will also be presented.

From Marian Reyes (Researcher, National Museum of the Philippines): mariancreyes@gmail.com
This session would like to share with colleagues what National Museum archaeologists and other researchers have done in the field and in our laboratories. Two new developments resulted in more studies being conducted: the recent hiring of new researchers as well as the establishment of a new Maritime and Underwater Cultural Heritage Division.  It is also the thrust now of the National Museum to come up with more interdisciplinary researches to achieve more holistic results.  Papers under this session will include the multidisciplinary researches in Suluan, (Samar), Butuan (Agusan del Norte) and southern Luzon.

From Marian Reyes (Researcher, National Museum of the Philippines): mariancreyes@gmail.com

Conveners: Philip J. Piper1 and Lam My Dung2

1 School of Archaeology and Anthropology, Australian National University, Canberra

2 Dept. of Archaeology, University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Hanoi.

 

Abstract:

It is becoming steadily more apparent that the transition from foraging to farming in Southeast Asia was far more complex than previously envisaged. Taking a multi-disciplinary approach, this session will examine recent research efforts into developing more reliable chronologies for the emergence of agriculture in Southeast Asia, understanding underlying economic strategies, including defining more clearly the origins and arrival of domesticated animals, identifying forager and farmer settlement patterns and lifeways – mobility vs sedentism, and interpreting potential interactions between foragers and early farmers across the region.

 If anyone is interested in presenting in this session could they please send a presentation abstract to: philip.piper@anu.edu.au

Trang


61 Phan Chu Trinh, Hoàn Kiếm, Hà Nội

+8424 38255449
Copyright © 2016 by khaocohoc.gov.vn.
Thiết kế bởi VINNO
Tổng số lượt truy cập: 9026271
Số người đang online: 16